‘Put Pleakley in the Wig, Cowards!’: Fans Express Frustration Over Character Design Changes in ‘Lilo & Stitch’

The recently released trailer for the live-action adaptation of Lilo & Stitch has stirred mixed reactions among fans and critics alike. The original animated film holds a special place in the hearts of many, leaving many to wonder: was a live-action reimagining even necessary?

The adaptation has sparked a range of controversies, particularly surrounding allegations of whitewashing. Critics point out that the casting choices feature actors with lighter skin than the characters as originally designed. Yet, the concerns don’t end there; another significant change has left a notable impact on fans, especially within the LGBTQ+ community.

The Question of Pleakley’s Design

Much of the discussion revolves around Pleakley, the endearing alien character known for his flamboyant cross-dressing in the original film. In the animated version, Pleakley, alongside his companion Jumba, dons comically inadequate human disguises, with Pleakley’s signature style involving women’s clothing. This was a defining aspect of his character, resonating with audiences for its humor and charm. However, the new adaptation replaces this iconic look with a mere holographic disguise, matching the appearance of actor Billy Magnussen, who portrays Pleakley. Fans are left lamenting the loss of style and personality in this change.

Social media has been abuzz with reactions, as fans express their disappointment. One user on Bluesky posted, “Put Pleakley in the wig, cowards, ” a sentiment echoed by many who cherished his original aesthetic.

Bluesky post that reads 'Put Pleakley in the wig, cowards' — (Bluesky/@amandawtwong.bsky.social‬)

Another fan remarked on the removal of the characters’ odd, alien appearances, stating: “I get why they have holographic disguises, but it kind of ruins the humor of the original—people being oblivious to two obviously alien beings.”

Many fans expressed that the alien designs, particularly for Pleakley, have not transitioned well into a CGI format. One Bluesky user commented, “Seeing Pleakley in the new Lilo & Stitch live-action trailer made me let out an actual shriek of horror.” Such sentiments have garnered significant support online, indicating a broader dissatisfaction with the new portrayal.

Underlying Issues: Diversity and Representation

While humor and nostalgia fuel most critiques, a deeper issue surfaces regarding representation and inclusivity. Some commentators are questioning whether the decision to forgo Pleakley’s cross-dressing aligns with the current political landscape, particularly amidst rising anti-DEI policies across the United States. Has the broader anti-trans sentiment influenced creative decisions at Disney?

One user argued that the alterations were not only cost-driven—favoring cheaper holographic effects over thorough CGI—but also a response to a perceived need to tone down elements considered “too woke” or political. Voices on social media have been vocal, with one asserting that a note from Disney executives aimed at minimizing LGBTQ+ characteristics was reminiscent of past instances where creative expressions were stifled.

A cartoon depicting the disconnect between Disney's public image and their actions towards LGBTQ+ content — (Alex Hirsch)

In conclusion, as the anticipation builds around the release of the live-action Lilo & Stitch, one thing remains clear: whether the new adaptation will meet expectations, especially while grappling with issues of representation and character integrity, is yet to be seen. At the very least, fans can agree on one thing—at least Stitch looks cute!

Source & Images