Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Durability Test: Issues with Build Quality, Removable Camera Rings, Scratch-Prone Display, and Misaligned Logo

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Durability Test: Issues with Build Quality, Removable Camera Rings, Scratch-Prone Display, and Misaligned Logo

Samsung has recently unveiled its much-anticipated Galaxy S25 series, featuring subtle design updates alongside significant enhancements in performance. Positioned as an ‘S’ year upgrade, the Galaxy S25 Ultra showcases only incremental hardware improvements. However, recent durability assessments reveal several potential drawbacks, including issues related to the camera rings, which appear to prioritize aesthetics over functionality.

Concerns Over Build Quality: Detachable Camera Rings and Misaligned Branding

A new durability test by JerryRigEverything on YouTube has raised alarms regarding the construction of the Galaxy S25 Ultra. This assessment indicates a decline in several areas compared to its predecessor. Notably, the absence of Bluetooth features in the S Pen raises eyebrows, alongside the display’s susceptibility to scratches, which occur at a level 6 and deepen at level 7.

The previous model, the Galaxy S24 Ultra, was celebrated for its superior scratch resistance compared to competitors. Users accustomed to this robust feature might find the reduced durability of the Galaxy S25 Ultra disappointing, leading some to contemplate retaining their previous model. JerryRigEverything’s scratch test highlights that the newer variant has suffered from a decrease in glass hardness, prompting speculation about the effects of implementing Gorilla Armor 2.

The overall aesthetic quality of the device is further questioned by the appearance of misaligned Samsung branding on the back. Although this may not impact functionality, it suggests a worrying lack of meticulous attention to detail. It remains uncertain whether this misalignment is widespread across all units or specific to the tested one.

Galaxy S25 Ultra Durability Test

Another significant omission is the removal of Bluetooth functionality from the S Pen, which has left many users perplexed. This deletion eliminates various convenient features, such as the capability for the S Pen to function as a remote camera shutter. There are speculations that Samsung may be reserving this feature for the upcoming Galaxy Ring, but clarity is still needed on this front.

Additionally, the durability test has unveiled that the camera rings on the back are easily detached. Although glued in place, these rings are notably elevated from the surface, making them susceptible to being pried off with minimal effort. This raises concerns not only about their durability but also their design choice, which could lead to dust accumulation beneath the camera components.

In summary, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra introduces various internal enhancements, including the advanced Snapdragon 8 Elite chip and fresh Galaxy AI features, these are overshadowed by notable compromises in durability. As consumers, it is imperative to assess whether these design and performance trade-offs affect your purchasing decision. Has Samsung indeed compromised the integrity of the Galaxy S25 series?

Source & Images

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *