Morgan Stanley: China’s Strategies Are Pushing the US Towards Weakness in Advanced Robotics

This content is not intended as investment advice. The author does not hold any positions in the stocks mentioned.

In a thought-provoking report, Morgan Stanley, a prominent investment bank, posits that China is strategically positioning itself for a significant role in the robotics sector. Humanoid robots have become increasingly prominent in discussions surrounding financial markets, bolstered by advocates such as Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, and Elon Musk from Tesla. The latest findings from Morgan Stanley reveal the bank’s optimistic outlook on humanoid robotics and present key factors contributing to China’s lead over the United States in this arena.

Key Drivers of China’s Robotic Advancement as Outlined by Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley identifies ten pivotal reasons why China is excelling in robotics development, several of which merit closer examination. The report begins by highlighting China’s dominance in the rare-earth metals sector, where it commands a remarkable 65% of global mining and an even greater 85% of rare earth refining.

Rare earth elements like yttrium, neodymium, and terbium are crucial for electronic manufacturing. During trade negotiations under President Donald Trump, China leveraged its position in the rare earth supply chain, illustrating its substantial influence over these essential materials.

The report suggests that China’s control over rare earth metals allows it to dictate terms for the Western manufacturing landscape, providing significant advantages in the robotics sector. With the challenges facing the establishment of new factories, which can take upwards of 20 years to complete, China’s leverage becomes even more pronounced.

Tesla's Optimus robot — Tesla’s Optimus robot.

Beyond raw materials, Morgan Stanley argues that advanced manufacturing technologies—stemming from technology transfers from Western firms combined with innovative local ideas—are pivotal to China’s robotic advancements. Moreover, the principle of “Creative Destruction”plays a significant role, where the Chinese government has fostered a competitive environment. As the report notes, “every major city and province has its own fund aimed at embodied AI/robotics, ”resulting in intense internal competition that accelerates AI and robotics innovation in the country.

The motivation to integrate cutting-edge technologies within the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) also propels China’s progress in robotics. Additionally, facing demographic challenges has created urgency in developing physical AI solutions. Public interest in robotics is being cultivated through various nationwide events, including marathons, boxing competitions, and dance showcases.

The report underscores a crucial area where China outpaces the U. S.: vocational education. In 2023, China boasted around “5 million students enrolled in over 11, 000 vocational schools, ”while the U. S.had approximately “923k students in vocational-focused programs, ”according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

Additionally, the report elaborates on the impacts of government subsidies, infrastructure investments, and what is referred to as the “Long Game.”Direct and indirect R&D subsidies in China, including allowances for companies to deduct 200% of qualified R&D expenses from their tax obligations, significantly bolster the robotic manufacturing sector. The aggressive investment in infrastructure further enhances this growth.

Finally, the concept of the “Long Game”embodies China’s strategic approach. Drawing parallels to the ancient Chinese board game Go, Morgan Stanley describes China’s method as one of “patience and combative coexistence, ”focused on psychological advantage rather than direct confrontation to outmaneuver adversaries over time.

This strategic mindset reflects historical principles dating back to the fifth century BC, contrasting with the relatively younger American landscape where short-term thinking often prevails due to social mobility and investors’ focus on immediate outcomes like growth and stock buybacks.

Source & Images