Exynos 2600 Achieves 59% Efficiency Improvement Over A19 Pro in Geekbench 6 Multi-Core Test with 2nm GAA Process Reducing Power Leakage

Evaluating Rumors: Our Rating System

0-20%: Unlikely – Lacks credible sources 21-40%: Questionable – Some concerns remain 41-60%: Plausible – Reasonable evidence 61-80%: Probable – Strong evidence 81-100%: Highly Likely – Multiple reliable sources

Current Assessment of Rumor Probability Rating: 35% Status: Questionable

Evaluation Scores

Source Credibility: 1/5 Corroboration: 2/5 Technical Validation: 2/5 Timeline Accuracy: 2/5

Samsung’s Exynos 2600: A New Contender Samsung’s inaugural 2nm GAA chipset, the Exynos 2600, has made a notable impression in its recent Geekbench 6 tests. The performance scores for both single-core and multi-core setups align closely with those of the latest flagship System-on-Chips (SoCs).However, a primary concern has been its power consumption, especially in comparison to competitors. Does It Outperform the A19 Pro? Recent information shared by @SPYGO19726 indicates that the Exynos 2600 prototype recorded exceptional power consumption figures while running Geekbench 6. Unlike the unspecified performance metrics noted in the leaks, the power draw data suggests that the Exynos 2600 may significantly outperform Apple’s A19 Pro in efficiency. Past analyses comparing the A19 Pro with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Dimensity 9500 revealed that the Apple chipset executed at a mere 12.1W during multi-core tasks, marking it as the most efficient processor in that lineup. In contrast, the Exynos 2600 recorded a power consumption of only 7.6W for multi-core and 3.6W for single-core testing.

2600 efficiency notes Power & Efficiency Test Avg. Power (W) — Geekbench 6 Single-Core: 3.6 W Lower leakage on 2 nm node Geekbench 6 Multi-Core: 7.6 W Better sustained power headroom — S (@SPYGO19726) November 2, 2025

The reduced power consumption is credited to lower leakage thanks to the cutting-edge 2nm GAA manufacturing process utilized for the Exynos 2600. Additionally, rising expectations are indicated for GFXBench performance, which should demonstrate a mere 5.4W during GPU-centric benchmarks. Overall, the Exynos 2600 appears to offer a 30% performance increase per watt compared to its predecessor, the Exynos 2400. The competitive landscape in CPU technology remains promising, and it will be interesting to see if the Exynos 2600 retains its strong performance in its commercial version. News Source: @SPYGO19726 Additional Details & Images