Intel Core Ultra X9 388H Achieves 10% Increase in Multi-Threaded Performance Compared to Ultra 9 285H in Initial PassMark Benchmarks

The flagship Panther Lake processor, the Core Ultra X9 388H, has shown impressive capabilities and is expected to be a noteworthy upgrade from its predecessor, particularly due to its enhanced integrated graphics performance.

Core Ultra X9 388H Benchmarked in PassMark: Significant Multi-Threaded Improvements Over Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel’s Core Ultra Series 3, also referred to as Panther Lake CPUs, stand out with remarkable performance enhancements compared to earlier models. This series is unique among mobile processors, delivering both superior CPU performance and significant advancements in integrated graphics over the previous generation. Recent leaks have consistently indicated noteworthy improvements, especially when it comes to multi-threaded performance, thanks to the new Xe3 architecture driving the integrated graphics.

Comparative performance data of Intel Core Ultra processors

For those eager to see benchmark outcomes for the Core Ultra X9 388H, previous benchmarks have hinted at its capabilities, but the recent PassMark findings provide a clearer picture. Earlier assessments on Geekbench showcased the X9 388H easily outmatching the Core Ultra 9 285H, while also competing closely with the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Within the most recent PassMark benchmark, the Core Ultra X9 388H significantly surpassed the Ultra 9 285H in terms of multi-threaded performance, achieving nearly a 10% higher score.

Benchmark scores for the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Two entries for the Core Ultra X9 388H are currently available, revealing that its single-core performance is comparable to that of the 285H. Notably, the second measurement shows a slight increase in single-core score, alongside a significant 17% improvement in the multi-threaded test. However, it is important to contextualize these results; the 285H can achieve similar scores when its best performances are considered. Overall analysis indicates that the X9 388H has a clear performance advantage over the 285H, even though they feature the same number of cores, albeit with different core architectures.

Notably, the Panther Lake processor adopts a configuration with two fewer Performance cores while introducing two additional LP-E cores, enhancing efficiency. The X9 388H is rated for a considerably lower thermal design power (TDP) than the 285H, with a maximum boost frequency of 5.1 GHz compared to the 5.4 GHz of the 285H. Additionally, its integrated Arc B390 graphics outstrip the capabilities offered by the prior Core Ultra Series 2 models.

For more information, you can explore the sources: PassMark, @x86deadandback

Source & Images