The Back to the Future trilogy is a cornerstone of cinematic history, revered for its imaginative narrative, memorable characters, and thrilling time-travel escapades. The franchise didn’t just give us a remarkable film; it opened the door to an entire trilogy celebrated for its intricate storytelling and interconnected plots. Interestingly, when the original film debuted in 1985, the notion of a sequel was not part of the creators’ vision.
This decision posed a significant challenge during the production of Back to the Future Part II. Director Robert Zemeckis, not anticipating further installments, admitted that if he had foreseen the sequel, he would have approached the film’s ending differently, ultimately affecting the character of Jennifer.
Robert Zemeckis Would Have Excluded Jennifer from Back to the Future’s Conclusion
Complications Arising from Jennifer’s Inclusion in the DeLorean
In a revealing moment from the documentary “Making The Trilogy,”Zemeckis explained the hindrance Jennifer’s presence in the DeLorean presented for the sequel. He stated, “I wasn’t designing a movie for a sequel because if I was, I never would have put the girlfriend in the car. That became a gigantic problem in writing a sequel.” This insight underscores the challenges that emerged due to a decision intended to conclude Marty and Jennifer’s storyline in a satisfying manner.
While the original film’s finale depicted Marty winning Jennifer’s affection and embarking on future adventures, the writing team faced a complex task in determining her role in the sequel. Ultimately, rather than creating an integral part for her, the writers chose to have Jennifer faint upon encountering her future self, thus sidelining her character.
Originally portrayed by Claudia Wells in the first film and later by Elisabeth Shue in the sequels, Jennifer was never intended to be central to the plot. Marty and Doc are undeniably the emotional core of the series. By sidelining her character, the filmmakers ensured the storyline remained focused on the camaraderie and escapades of Marty and Doc.
Back to the Future’s Conclusion: An Unexpected Frame for a Nonexistent Sequel
“Where We’re Going, We Don’t Need Roads”
The iconic image of the flying DeLorean soaring through the sky remains etched in memory. However, reflecting on this climactic ending reveals an intriguing dissonance: its specificity seems striking for a story that was originally designed without a sequel in mind. With Doc Brown’s sudden appearance and the mention of Marty and Jennifer’s future children facing troubles, the closing scene appears to set the stage for a follow-up. Despite this, both Zemeckis and Bob Gale have reiterated that the creation of Part II was not an inception during the production of the first film.
In hindsight, the intriguing conclusion of Back to the Future seems more like a playful, open-ended moment without a serious setup for a sequel. It appears that the filmmakers aimed to leave audiences entertained and pondering the “what if” scenarios, rather than expecting to revisit those narratives later. Yet this choice feels like an unintended risk; the specific hints regarding Marty and Jennifer’s future dilemmas, paired with Doc’s pressing urgency, paint a picture of a world yearning for further exploration, despite Zemeckis and Gale lacking a concrete plan at that time.
Leave a Reply