Overview
- Hollywood’s fixation on trilogies limits the vast storytelling potential of Matt Reeves’ Batman universe.
- Not all narratives are suited to a three-part structure; some narratives require additional films for comprehensive exploration.
- Reeves’ Batman narrative merits more than three films; it should not be restricted to a trilogy format.
The Batman Part II has understandably sparked concerns among fans regarding the pace of its script development. However, a far more significant issue lurks beneath the surface: this film series is poised to become the second trilogy centered on Batman within a span of just over twenty years. While a trilogy can be a conventional choice, it risks overshadowing what could be the most expansive live-action presentation of Batman since Christopher Nolan’s acclaimed The Dark Knight Rises in 2012.
Having demonstrated his prowess in crafting trilogies through the Planet of the Apes series, Matt Reeves’ ambition to mold The Batman in a similar vein would unfortunately confine his creative vision of a dark, complex Gotham to three films, excluding various spin-offs. This limitation underutilizes Robert Pattinson’s portrayal of Batman, whose dynamic character and the richly layered Gotham established by Reeves could flourish across a broader tapestry of films.
The Hollywood Trilogy Obsession
Trilogies are not a recent phenomenon; however, their prevalence in Hollywood has become increasingly pronounced. The allure of the three-act structure—setup, confrontation, and resolution—along with the inherent cohesiveness it brings to storytelling, has made trilogies a popular choice in cinema. Since the iconic The Godfather, films labeled as trilogies have developed a strong appeal to audiences.
The early 2000s marked a renaissance for trilogies, with blockbuster franchises emerging such as Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings, Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man, and Nolan’s own The Dark Knight trilogy. The latter is often regarded as a pinnacle in the realm of comic book trilogies, outshining even Raimi’s acclaimed work by not only attaining a historic $1 billion gross with The Dark Knight but also securing a revered status on Rotten Tomatoes.
Trilogies Are Not One-Size-Fits-All
It’s crucial to recognize that not all stories lend themselves to a trilogy’s three-part structure. Some tales, such as The Hobbit—which is based on a relatively short book—The Matrix, and Fifty Shades, arguably worked better as standalone films. Conversely, stories like The Hunger Games, which expanded into four films, necessitated a more extensive narrative exploration.
Taking George R.R. Martin’s Fire and Blood as a case in point, its detailed lore would suffer if limited to a trilogy format. For instance, the “Dance of the Dragons”storyline could theoretically fit within a trilogy framework; however, critical epic confrontations would be necessarily sacrificed, resulting in a diminished overall impact. While adaptations like House of the Dragon offer alternative narrative pathways, constraining epic stories to a trilogy can severely compromise their scope and richness.
Matt Reeves’ Batman Deserves More Than Just Three Films
Reeves’ vision for Gotham extends far beyond mere trilogy constraints. His portrayal of Batman and the intricately designed Gotham could easily support a series of films, ideally spanning at least half a dozen cinematic experiences. This is particularly appealing to fans still reminiscing about the complexities of Nolan’s trilogy, yet those longing for deeper explorations into Batman’s psyche and relationship with his rogues’ gallery feel underserved when bound by a three-movie limitation.
The Caped Crusader’s extensive list of adversaries presents a rich tapestry of lore that could be unpacked through additional films. While spin-off series like The Penguin may offer some relief, they cannot replace the depth that could be achieved with more Batman-centric narratives. After all, since the turn of the century, Warner Bros. has introduced a new Batman actor roughly every seven years; the future project Batman: The Brave and the Bold under Andy Muschietti would mark the fifth portrayal within 26 years.
If Pattinson cannot assume the role of Batman in the evolving DC Universe, the least the studio should ensure is that he has the opportunity to star in at least five films before transitioning to the next iteration. Given the potential for “Batman fatigue,”this might be a limited opportunity.
By the time the third film in the proposed trilogy is ready for release, Pattinson would be approximately 43 years old, and yet still suitable to carry forth the mantle of the Dark Knight for three additional films. Warner Bros.’ history offers a hopeful precedent; Todd Phillips’ Joker, initially intended as a standalone, transitioned into a sequel after its unexpected box office success. This suggests that The Batman series should embrace the flexibility of open-ended storytelling rather than confine itself to the stringent framework of a trilogy.
Leave a Reply