The M5 iPad Pro: How Apple Powers a Bicycle with Jet Engine Technology

Apple’s M5 iPad Pro stands out in the world of tablets, showcasing impressive specifications that rival high-performance computing devices. However, this advanced technology is somewhat hindered by its design, which limits the iPad Pro’s full potential, ultimately branding it as a glorified media consumption tool.

M5 iPad Pro: Unmatched Power but Inadequate Battery Life

Equipped with the remarkably powerful M5 system-on-chip (SoC), the latest iPad Pro sets a new standard in tablet performance. For a deeper understanding of the M5’s capabilities, consider the following specifications:

CPU
- 6 efficiency cores operating at 2.95 GHz
- 4 performance cores running at 4.60 GHz
- 16 MB L2 cache
GPU – The M5 features a robust 10-core GPU, each core equipped with a dedicated Neural Accelerator, enabling enhanced processing for machine learning tasks.
A 16-core Neural Engine for advanced computational tasks.
RAM – 16 GB of LPDDR5X unified memory at 4.8 GHz, delivering impressive bandwidth up to 153 GB/s.
Connectivity – Incorporates a C1 modem chip alongside an N1 wireless networking chip.

GeekBench 6 benchmark screen showing single-core score 3670 and multi-core score 13560. — Apple M4 iPad Pro GeekBench 6 Scores

GeekBench 6 benchmark screen showing Single-Core Score of 4175 and Multi-Core Score of 15577. — Apple M5 iPad Pro GeekBench 6 Scores

In benchmark comparisons, the M5 iPad Pro achieves a single-core score approximately 14% higher than the M4 version, with its multi-core performance proving about 15% superior. This leap in capabilities isn’t astonishing given that the M5 chip closes in on the performance levels of Apple’s professional-grade M1 Ultra chip.

Nonetheless, a crucial consideration arises: does a tablet truly warrant a high-performance, workstation-class SoC like the M5? While enthusiasts argue that this device enables substantial video editing capabilities from near anywhere, one must ponder its limitations.

For instance, what meaningful video editing can one accomplish within the scant 3 to 4-hour battery span offered by the M5 iPad Pro? This duration, especially under demanding tasks such as video editing, raises questions about practicality. When you frequently find yourself having to reconnect to a power source to continue working, does this not diminish the “portability” advantage commonly associated with tablets? Moreover, the potential stress from a dwindling battery life may further complicate your workflow.

In my assessment, it seems more pragmatic to consider a MacBook Pro from the outset for any serious productivity work, as it delivers the power without the inconvenience of constant recharging. It strikes me as if Apple has attempted to enhance an average bike with jet engines, creating an impressive yet impractical vehicle. The M5’s capabilities may soar, but without a commensurate form factor, it feels misused in this device.

Ultimately, the M5 iPad Pro remains an intriguing yet paradoxical contender in the tech landscape, unable to fully utilize its immense capabilities due to inherent design constraints.

Source & Images