In a bold statement, Stephen King has announced that he will not be participating in this year’s Oscars, advocating for the cancellation of the ceremony. His remarks echo sentiments shared by other influential figures in Hollywood, including Rosanna Arquette and Jean Smart. The 97th Academy Awards, set for March 2, will honor films released in 2024, with notable contenders such as Anora, Conclave, Dune: Part Two, The Brutalist, Emilia Pérez, A Complete Unknown, The Substance, and Wicked.
On his Threads account, King reaffirmed his stance. He acknowledges that while some may view the Oscars as a celebration of life—an idea he concedes holds merit—he cannot disregard the incongruity of the Academy proceeding with its plans as Los Angeles battles devastating fires. He provocatively remarked on this inconsistency, likening it to “Nero fiddling while Rome burns.”
Implications for the Oscars
Despite Criticism, The Oscars Proceed
In his critique, King draws parallels between the Academy and Nero, a symbol of excess and irresponsibility during a time of crisis, while likening Los Angeles to ancient Rome, once a center of civilization. His analogy resonates with the catastrophic Great Fire of Rome, a calamitous event that burned for nearly a week, destroying significant portions of the city.
This historical comparison speaks volumes regarding the ramifications of the current crisis in Los Angeles County. Yet, the Academy seems determined to carry on with the planned ceremony, having only shifted the announcement of this year’s nominations from January 17 to January 23 as a response to the ongoing fires.
Counterpoint to King’s Perspective
Benefits of the Oscars Extend Beyond Glamour
Critics of King’s viewpoint have highlighted several key reasons to maintain the Oscars. Foremost among them is the substantial employment opportunities generated by the event. The Oscars impact not only celebrities but also countless professionals in various sectors. The influx of visitors for the ceremony significantly boosts local hospitality and food service industries, creating jobs for many residents.
Moreover, the ripple effect extends to other sectors as well. Workers behind the scenes—lighting and sound technicians, make-up artists, drivers, and event staff—also gain meaningful work from the event. As such, cancelling the Oscars would exacerbate economic challenges in Los Angeles, especially given the locality’s current struggles due to the fires.
Additionally, the Oscars play a vital role in promoting the broader entertainment industry. For Stephen King himself, many of his films have garnered prestigious nominations, enhancing his visibility and legacy. Iconic adaptations like The Green Mile, Carrie, and Stand by Me collectively received 15 nominations, supporting King’s esteemed status in Hollywood.
Although the fires have inflicted severe damage, including to areas like Palisades Charter High School—where scenes from Carrie were filmed—the upcoming ceremony could be pivotal. Scheduled to occur when recovery efforts might be underway, the Oscars offer a potential platform for drawing attention and support to rebuilding initiatives in affected regions.
Expert Insight on King’s Statements
King’s Stance Remains Firm
While King’s comments stem from a genuine concern for those affected by the wildfires, cancelling the Oscars may not be the most constructive course of action. A more viable alternative would involve transforming the ceremony into a fundraising opportunity, allowing the film industry to rally for disaster relief efforts. This approach not only continues the tradition of the Oscars but also serves to highlight critical issues facing the community.
Source: Stephen King/Threads
Leave a Reply