Spotify’s Nearly Decade-Long Battle to Break Free from Apple’s App Store Control

The Impact of Apple’s App Store on Company Revenue in 2024

In 2024, Apple’s App Store generated approximately 8% of the company’s total revenue. However, this segment is remarkably profitable, boasting operating margins exceeding 75%, as highlighted in court documents referenced by the Wall Street Journal.

The Battle Against App Store Dominance

This lucrative revenue source has faced increasing scrutiny and backlash from companies like Epic Games and Spotify. The latter has been instrumental in influencing global antitrust perceptions regarding Apple’s perceived monopoly over its App Store.

Background of the Dispute

The animosity between Spotify and Apple can be traced back to 2015, following Apple’s launch of Apple Music. This new service, priced at $9.99 per month, undercut Spotify’s subscription rate of $12.99, prompting Spotify’s executives to view it as a direct attack on their market position.

Spotify’s Strategic Response

Adding to the tension was Spotify’s obligation to pay Apple a hefty “Apple tax”of 30% on all App Store revenue. In light of these challenges, Spotify recruited veteran antitrust lawyer Horacio Gutierrez from Microsoft in 2016. Shortly thereafter, Spotify submitted a revised app to Apple that prevented new users from signing up via the app itself, directing them to upgrade through email instead.

This strategic move by Spotify aimed to challenge Apple’s App Store practices. Predictably, Apple rejected the update, leading Gutierrez to confront Apple’s General Counsel Bruce Sewell in a heated meeting. The result was a deadlock, with both parties trading accusations over market competitiveness and regulatory compliance.

Regulatory Response and International Lobbying

Despite slight concessions from Apple on the app update, relations deteriorated further. Spotify sought assistance from U. S.regulators, but received little support. Consequently, Gutierrez shifted focus to European regulators, where he found an ally in Margrethe Vestager, the European Commissioner for Competition.

A pivotal meeting in Brussels between Vestager and Apple’s CEO Tim Cook is frequently described as disastrous; Cook’s tone-deaf lecture on tax laws was perceived as intimidation. Spotify then initiated an A/B testing strategy demonstrating that Apple’s policies limited subscriptions by as much as 20% compared to Google’s more flexible approach on Android.

The European Commission’s Intervention

In March 2019, Spotify officially lodged a complaint with the European Commission. During the review, Apple accused Spotify of leveraging its market power while refusing to contribute to app ecosystem sustainability. However, the Commission ultimately ruled in favor of Spotify, imposing a hefty 1.8 billion euro fine on Apple, a decision that Apple is currently contesting.

In the wake of these developments, Gutierrez and his associates advocated for reform in EU antitrust regulations, leading to the enactment of the Digital Markets Act in 2022. This legislation explicitly prohibits Apple from preventing developers from directing users to alternative payment methods outside the App Store. In 2025, Apple faced a further $500 million penalty for its delays in complying with these new rules.

Apple’s Resistance to Change

Under Tim Cook’s leadership, Apple appears reluctant to relinquish its App Store stronghold. The company continues to propose fees that maintain existing structures while claiming compliance with the Digital Markets Act. This ongoing struggle highlights the complex dynamics between regulatory frameworks and corporate strategies in the tech industry.

Source & Images