SpaceX Criticizes Foreign Duties and Fees on Satellite Services in Letter to Trump Administration

This article does not serve as investment advice. The author holds no shares in any of the companies discussed herein.

In recent discourse surrounding international trade policies, both Tesla and SpaceX have raised their concerns regarding President Trump’s imposition of tariffs on trade partners. Tesla’s recent communication to the U. S.Trade Representative spotlighted escalating manufacturing costs due to potential tariffs. Conversely, SpaceX has adopted a different stance. Their letter includes signatures and addresses the more complex regulatory landscape hindering its Starlink satellite service, rather than focusing solely on tariffs.

Challenges in Global Satellite Services: SpaceX’s Concerns

While Tesla forewarned the government that tariffs might invoke retaliatory actions and elevate production expenses by necessitating imports of essential components, SpaceX pinpointed specific obstacles affecting the expansion of its Starlink service worldwide.

SpaceX has articulated that various regulatory hurdles and trade barriers pose significant challenges in multiple international markets. According to the company, these limitations are obstructing “U. S.leadership in the space domain, ”which ultimately affects its ability to compete globally.

The firm has also highlighted that its competitors are exploiting these regulations to hinder SpaceX from providing superior and more affordable satellite internet solutions. Boasting the largest satellite internet constellation, Starlink is firmly positioned in both consumer and business sectors.

SpaceX Starlink satellites — A view of SpaceX’s Starlink satellites on their way to orbit. Image: SpaceX

SpaceX notes that in order to function effectively in various nations, it incurs charges related to wireless spectrum access, import duties on Starlink terminals, and the need to collaborate with local carriers for frequency sharing. These extensive and regulatory imposed costs “significantly escalate the expenses of operations in these countries, ”the company asserts.

Import duties on Starlink terminals are particularly problematic for SpaceX. The company points out that, while the U. S.does not impose similar taxes on comparable foreign products, specific jurisdictions levy duties that substantially inflate Starlink’s pricing in those markets. The additional charges can represent a significant fraction of total costs, hampering SpaceX’s ambitions to expand its customer base.

The firm detailed that such duties apply to items classified under HTS 8517.62. Furthermore, SpaceX argues that outdated regulatory frameworks are based on an assumption that satellite operations involve few terminals—as opposed to the millions it actually ships globally.

Consequently, SpaceX concludes:

If fees are assessed on a per-terminal basis, rather than via a blanket license or some other regulatory arrangement to account for the new design of non-geostationary satellite networks, the cost becomes an impediment to rolling out service to additional customers.

Source & Images