Simple Techniques for Detecting AI-Generated Text Effectively

Are you curious about whether a piece of writing was generated by an AI like ChatGPT? In many instances, a quick glance can reveal the truth. Indicators such as overly polished language, an absence of a distinct human touch, or an array of clichéd phrases can all signal AI-generated content, even without the aid of sophisticated detection tools.

Manually Identifying AI-Generated Writing

Although a range of software solutions exist to identify AI-created texts, none are foolproof. Here, we will explore the intuitive cues that experienced editors rely on during their review processes. Key factors include grammar and punctuation, paragraph organization, clarity of thought, logical sequencing of ideas, and the essential human context that imbues authentic writing.

No matter the sophistication of the AI model involved, deviations from standard writing conventions can easily expose AI-generated content. Human writers, even those less experienced, typically steer clear of the mistakes frequently made by AI systems like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, or Perplexity.

Below is a concise overview of common markers to evaluate the authenticity of any written work. For a deeper dive into this topic, consider exploring the latest comprehensive guide titled “signs of AI writing” put together by a community of Wikipedia editors, myself included.

Recognizing Formulaic Language

Many readers have encountered social media posts or articles that seem to emanate an AI-like quality. This perception isn’t merely instinctual; it arises from the characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs) that rely on statistical norms, resulting in jargon-laden sentences devoid of subtlety and often overly formalized, resembling a predictable formula.

Example of AI-generated text with excessive fluffy language.

AI writing tools often err on the side of excessively formal language – a stark contrast to the natural narrative nuances exhibited by human authors. Even repeated attempts to fine-tune AI-generated text can result in an unnaturally neutral tone, indicating possible AI involvement. Unlike AI, human authors modulate their voices according to emotional context. Notably, Gemini has demonstrated a tendency to provide structured responses without a personalized touch.

Absence of Genuine Human Voice

The absence of a human voice is a significant telltale sign. A writer’s unique voice infuses their work with personality. From technical articles to personal reviews, distinctive patterns emerge that are characteristic of individual authors.

Despite extensive data access, AI models struggle to craft writings with a distinct personal flair. For instance, when I tasked Gemini Pro with creatively reimagining Aesop’s Fable, “The Tortoise and the Hare, ” with a twist, it resorted to technical jargon, missing the emotional nuances of human storytelling.

Gemini output lacking a creative writer's touch.

Human writing is often marked by idiosyncrasies, rich emotional tones, regional dialects, and personal idioms. In contrast, AI outputs lack individuality, leaning towards a monotonous tone that quickly becomes repetitive. Even when AI attempts to reflect emotion or draw from notable personalities, the results remain flat and devoid of authentic human experience.

Identifying Grammar and Structural Anomalies

While AI can effectively generate text with impeccable grammar, this refinement can sometimes cross into the realm of absurdity. A human writer typically avoids such pitfalls.

Overuse of Gerunds: These noun forms ending in -ing can become overly prevalent in AI-generated texts, reflecting trends found in academic writing. While gerunds can be useful, excessive quantities might create an awkward reading experience.

Example of excessive gerunds in AI-generated text.

Inconsistent Em Dash Usage: Some writers have moved away from em dashes to avoid appearing like AI. However, these punctuation marks, when used thoughtfully, should enhance rather than disrupt text flow.
Disrupted Narrative Flow: Unlike AI, human authors maintain cohesive narratives with clear transitions. AI outputs can experience jarring shifts, leading to logical inconsistencies.

Illustration of poor sequence and punctuation in AI text.

Overly Frequent Transitional Phrases: AI-generated texts often lean too heavily on transitions like “furthermore” or “moreover, ” compromising overall readability.
Uniform Paragraph Lengths: Typical AI texts contain paragraphs that are unnaturally consistent in length and structure, lacking the variation and personality present in human writing.

Can You Always Identify AI Writing?

The key question remains: can you definitively determine if AI authored a piece? Not every AI-generated output adheres to predictable patterns. Certain techniques can prompt ChatGPT to generate nuanced responses, creating a complex landscape for evaluation.

To ensure your text does not inadvertently resemble AI writing, consider refining your work to diminish these typical indicators. Some writers and students are turning to specialized “humanized AI writing services” to address these issues. However, the effectiveness of these solutions may vary. Ultimately, to avoid potential pitfalls down the line, it’s advisable to nurture your unique writing style and steer clear of overdependence on AI tools.

Source & Images