Racist Attacks Target Teen Track Star Without Understanding the Full Story

A wave of online vitriol has been directed at a teenage track athlete following the release of a video that seemingly shows her striking an opponent with a relay baton. However, the circumstances surrounding the event suggest it may have been accidental.

The scrutiny levied against Black female athletes is no secret. Take, for instance, the outrage surrounding Simone Biles’ decision to withdraw from the Olympics for mental health reasons or Sha’Carri Richardson’s exclusion from the 100m event over marijuana use. Angel Reese has also faced relentless criticism, often for actions that her peers undertake without similar backlash. Consequently, the media frenzy surrounding a viral video of high school senior Alaila Everett during a relay race was predictable; the intention to tarnish her reputation and subject her to intense racism was evident.

Before long, Fox News was publishing misleading headlines claiming that Everett had “bashed an opponent’s head.” This incited a barrage of extreme reactions from right-wing commentators demanding that she face severe legal consequences for “assaulting” someone with what they exaggeratedly termed a “deadly weapon” — a baton made from hollow material. As the outrage escalated, Everett received a multitude of death threats, with many choosing to overlook crucial details and deny her the benefit of the doubt.

Was the Track Incident an Accident?

Just a week ago, a video from a Virginia high school track meet surfaced on social media, quickly garnering attention. Spanning a mere few seconds, the footage features the women’s 4×200 relay race where Everett and student Kaelen Tucker are competing fiercely. As Tucker veers into Everett’s lane, the baton strikes Tucker twice in the head before she collapses off the track. The immediate assumption was that this was a deliberate act, leading to widespread sharing of the footage. Major media outlets, including Good Morning America, aired the video, often neglecting to include a statement from Everett while amplifying Tucker’s narrative.

@gma
“I just felt a bang on my head, and then I fell off the track immediately.” Junior Kaelen Tucker was running the second leg of the 4×200 relay in the Virginia State High School League Championships when footage shows another athlete striking her in the head with a baton. The 16-year-old was later diagnosed with a concussion.#news #sports #trackandfield

♬ original sound – Good Morning America

In the aftermath of the backlash and threats, Everett finally spoke out, asserting that the incident was inadvertent. She clarified that there was very little space between the runners, stating, “She [Tucker] was touching me to the point that when I pumped my arms, the baton hit her arm. I lost my balance, and my whole body turned, which is how she got hit.” In response to claims from Tucker’s family that she has not expressed remorse, Everett mentioned attempts to reach out, which were rebuffed.

Everett’s explanation aligns with observations made by track and field experts.Coaches and officials noted that Tucker made a risky move by cutting into Everett’s lane without adequate space, a maneuver likely responsible for the accidental baton contact. Lisa Carnes, an official with USA Track and Field, contextualized the incident as unintentional, suggesting that the contact was caused by Tucker’s decision to cut it too closely. Vince Pugh, a former athletic director, noted that an umpire might have issued a penalty for the unsafe proximity of the runners, arguing that the context of her loss of balance is essential in understanding the sequence of events.

Having participated in collegiate track, I can relate to the nuances involved in such high-paced events. There are many scenarios coupled with the risk of runners edging too close to the inside lane, resulting in instinctive balance adjustments that can lead to accidental baton strikes. Many observers may lack an understanding of the raw speed and quick reflexes required during these races, which culminate in rapid responses when faced with disruptions like proximity to other runners.

Furthermore, Everett’s family has voiced their disbelief regarding the allegations of intentional wrongdoing. They highlight her accomplishments as an all-state athlete and honor roll student, providing a backdrop that seemingly contradicts the notion of her malicious intent. Carnes supports their perspective, characterizing Everett as “a quiet, friendly, soft-spoken teenage girl who would never engage in such behavior.” While this isn’t indisputable evidence of innocence, it invites us to examine the incident closely: how likely is it that a dedicated athlete with no prior misbehavior would risk her career and reputation to intentionally harm another athlete in such a public setting?

Regardless of the outcome—whether it was indeed accidental or not—the situation remains under investigation. Online commentators are hastily calling for punishment without fully grasping the context. Even if the incident reflects a mistake rather than malice, the intensity of the outrage seems disproportionate. Recently, the same individuals advocating for severe repercussions against a teenage athlete were extending sympathy to a 25-year-old man accused of multiple offensive comments, reinforcing a double standard where young girls are lambasted while adult men are afforded leniency.

In this situation, it is essential to recognize that Everett is a minor—and whether this was an unfortunate mishap or an isolated error, the consequences should not equate to lifelong condemnation. The prevailing narrative seems eager to dismantle her future while ignoring the systemic racism that often targets young Black girls, contrasting sharply with the leniency shown to adult men exhibiting grievous misconduct.

Source&Images