
Samsung is taking strides in revamping its memory division by currently sampling its advanced HBM4 (High Bandwidth Memory) architecture with notable industry partners. This initiative aims to shift the trajectory of its HBM segment, which has encountered difficulties in the competitive landscape of memory technology.
Samsung’s Ambitious HBM4 Launch: Partnering with Tech Leaders
The South Korean tech giant is pivoting towards its HBM4 solution in hopes of reinvigorating its HBM operations, a strategy that has not always yielded success in the past. After an arduous journey attempting to gain NVIDIA’s qualifications for its HBM3 technology, which ultimately did not materialize, Samsung is now focusing on HBM4. Recent reports from Hankyung indicate that this new process is currently being sampled by leading tech players such as NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Google, suggesting potential partnerships in the near future.
In contrast, We Hynix has made headlines by demonstrating its HBM4 technology, reportedly ahead of schedule by six months, with mass production anticipated to begin in the next quarter. Meanwhile, Micron is also targeting an end-of-year launch for its own HBM4 offerings, intensifying the competitive landscape for Samsung as it gears up for its rollout.

Samsung’s HBM4 technology promises to incorporate advanced logic and semiconductor dies, leveraging its proprietary 4nm foundry process alongside the 10nm 6th-generation 1c DRAM—a standout in the industry for its capabilities. With a tentative delivery timeframe slated for H1 2026, Samsung finds itself lagging behind its competitors in terms of availability.
A critical consideration for potential clients remains whether Samsung can regain their trust for HBM solutions, especially after a series of execution challenges with previous iterations. Notably, recent developments revealed that Google had canceled its orders for Samsung’s HBM3E due to difficulties integrating with NVIDIA’s systems. As Samsung navigates its path forward with HBM4, it faces the looming question: will it redefine its strategy and emerge successfully, or will it repeat the pitfalls of past memory product launches?
Leave a Reply