
The forthcoming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is being touted as the inaugural RTX Blackwell GPU equipped with GDDR6 memory, positioning it as a competitively priced option in the graphics market.
NVIDIA Takes Aim at Intel and AMD Competitors with the RTX 5050
Recent reports have unveiled the specifications of NVIDIA’s new “budget contenders, ”the GeForce RTX 5050 and RTX 5060. With AMD launching its RX 9070 series, NVIDIA appears to be losing traction in the mid-range GPU segment, primarily due to the superior performance and affordability of AMD’s RDNA 4 graphics cards, which are widely available to consumers.
Nevertheless, the performance and pricing strategies of NVIDIA’s 50-class and 60-class GPUs will crucially influence market dynamics. According to insights from Benchlife, the RTX 5050 is set to be the first in its series to incorporate GDDR6 memory.

For context, NVIDIA’s transition to GDDR7 memory in its recent RTX 50 lineup promised enhanced performance but came at a premium. In contrast, AMD opted not to utilize this newer standard for its RX 9070 GPU series, allowing it to maintain competitive pricing, which has yielded remarkable performance-to-cost ratios for the Radeon RX 9070 XT. NVIDIA appears poised to adopt a similar strategy with the RTX 5050, but the effectiveness of this approach remains to be seen.
Specifications and Pricing of the RTX 5050
The rumored specifications for the RTX 5050 include 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a total board power (TBP) of 135W. Anticipated pricing for this model ranges from $199 to $249, positioning it strategically against Intel’s Arc B580, while also competing with AMD’s upcoming RX 9050 lineup. Given that NVIDIA had previously skipped releasing a 50-class GPU with its Ada Lovelace architecture, the introduction of the RTX 5050 is highly anticipated.
As NVIDIA prepares to launch the RTX 5050, industry observers will be keen to see how this new addition to the mid-range market performs against its competitors, especially given the increased competition from AMD and Intel.
Leave a Reply ▼