Nintendo Switch 2 Screen Performance 50% Slower Compared to Original Switch

Nintendo Switch 2 Display: Disappointing Performance Insights

Since the launch of the Nintendo Switch 2 earlier this month, the display has faced significant criticism from the gaming community, with recent findings from Monitor Unboxed providing even more compelling evidence of its shortcomings. Previously identified issues, such as minimal HDR capabilities and Variable Refresh Rate concerns, were further highlighted by the channel’s latest examination of the display’s response time, revealing disappointing results.

Analysis of Response Time Performance

Although Monitor Unboxed was unable to employ their standard testing tools for monitors, they nevertheless performed a manual evaluation with 20 gray-to-gray transitions at 60Hz, the only refresh rate currently supported by available games. The average response time clocked in at 33 milliseconds, placing this display significantly behind standard PC monitors, which typically range between 6 and 20 milliseconds. Shockingly, this performance is approximately 50% slower than that of the original Nintendo Switch, which registered a response time of 21 milliseconds.

Possible Reasons for Underwhelming Performance

Monitor Unboxed suggests that the absence of Overdrive technology could be a contributing factor to these lackluster metrics. Overdrive is considered essential in modern displays as it enhances response times; however, its implementation on the Nintendo Switch 2 may compromise battery life—a critical concern for a handheld device. With the new model featuring a larger 7.9-inch display, increased resolution at 1080p, and enhanced brightness (430 nits vs.310 nits in the original), battery duration is already under pressure.

Impact on Gaming Experience

The display’s response time of approximately twice the 16.7 milliseconds frame interval at 60Hz hampers its ability to refresh adequately before the next cycle, leading to noticeable blur trails and poor motion clarity. This phenomenon was illustrated in the Blur Busters UFO test featured in their review. Furthermore, Monitor Unboxed argued that increasing to a 120Hz refresh rate would not substantially enhance motion quality due to the panel’s inherent limitations in processing speed.

The Future: OLED Displays?

A promising solution to the current display issues could lie in the potential for an OLED Nintendo Switch 2 display. Such a technology would likely provide much-improved response times and motion clarity, while also enhancing contrast ratios, thereby addressing the existing display’s lackluster HDR performance. Nonetheless, one positive aspect of the current LCD screen is its wide color gamut support, which has reportedly improved to cover 98% of the DCI-P3 color space, a significant jump from the 79% supported by the original console.

Market Response and Consumer Sentiment

Despite these notable flaws, the Nintendo Switch 2 is reportedly selling exceptionally well. This phenomenon suggests that many in Nintendo’s user base may prioritize other features and gaming experiences over display specifications.

Source & Images