Intel’s Main Lobbyist for Ohio Facility and Multiple Project Managers Depart Amidst U.S. Chipmaking Slowdown

Intel is experiencing a significant ‘talent drain, ’ with notable departures not just at entry-level positions but among key executives involved in the company’s pivotal Ohio facility.

Departure of Intel’s Lobbyist Amid Delays in the Ohio Fab Project

The company, often referred to as Team Blue, has been grappling with sluggish economic conditions in recent quarters. This downturn has been attributed to multiple factors, including underperformance in its foundry division, which has not met industry expectations. A recent report from Columbus Business First reveals that several leading figures associated with Intel’s Ohio One project have left the organization. Among these is Kevin Hoggatt, identified as a crucial lobbyist for the project.

Hoggatt has been instrumental in managing Intel’s ‘government relations’ efforts. In a LinkedIn announcement regarding his departure, he reflected on his significant involvement, including attending the groundbreaking ceremony of the Ohio One plant alongside President Biden. Additionally, Hoggatt was present with Intel’s interim co-CEO David Zinsner during President Trump’s inauguration, highlighting his role in fostering collaborative relationships with various U. S.administrations.

Kevin Hoggatt LinkedIn post about leaving Intel, showcasing key events like The Ohio One groundbreaking and Trump's inauguration. — Image Credits: LinkedIn

In addition to Hoggatt, other notable departures include Toby Starr, the public affairs manager, and key project figures such as construction site manager Sanjay Patel and senior program manager Tom Marshall. It’s particularly concerning that three years have passed since the Ohio One fab was announced, yet there are few indications of a timeline for commencing high-end process production. This delay underscores how the ongoing economic challenges within Intel are impacting the company’s ambitions in chip manufacturing.

Current projections suggest that the Ohio fab may not become operational until 2031. Furthermore, Intel’s facility in Oregon is also facing challenges, including large-scale layoffs and reductions in investment. At this juncture, Intel’s primary focus is on mitigating operating losses and ensuring that ongoing projects yield substantial returns, relegating its U. S.chipmaking initiatives to a lower priority.

Source & Images