Intel’s Current Status: Exploring Strategic Sacrifices by CEO Lip-Bu Tan to Restore the Company’s Former Success

Recent shifts at Intel have initiated waves of change, particularly following the appointment of CEO Lip-Bu Tan. This transition has introduced some uncertainty in the market, yet it also unveils a clearer direction for Team Blue. In this article, we’ll explore these developments and assess Intel’s trajectory moving forward.

To better understand the strategic landscape, it’s crucial to examine Intel’s operations under former CEO Pat Gelsinger. Gelsinger’s leadership was characterized by his commitment to a “hybrid”operational model, prioritizing in-house design and manufacturing capabilities. His “IDM 2.0″strategy laid the groundwork for a robust foundry division, as he aimed to position Intel as a serious competitor to TSMC through aggressive expansion initiatives.

Despite these ambitious plans, the anticipated success of the Intel Foundry Services (IFS) has not materialized as expected. A significant example includes the 18A node, originally slated for market introduction in 2024, which has now been pushed back with updated projections for early 2026. This delay follows billions invested in the foundry sector, which has experienced operational losses, raising questions about the sustainability of these efforts.

Another oversight during Gelsinger’s tenure was the lukewarm approach toward the burgeoning AI sector, especially in contrast to competitors like NVIDIA and AMD. Despite the increasing demand for AI technology, Intel has failed to deliver a comprehensive rack-scale solution, resulting in lost revenues that have not reached the billion-dollar milestone, representing a significant missed opportunity.

Intel’s New CEO Lip-Bu Tan: A Call for Change

Lip-Bu Tan, who was part of Intel’s board in 2022, stepped back in 2024 due to bureaucratic challenges but returned as CEO in March 2025. Upon stepping into the leadership role, Tan recognized the key areas where Intel lagged and initiated a strategic overhaul from the ground up. Rather than immediately attacking specific business divisions, he prioritized internal administrative reforms to streamline operations.

It had been a tough period for quite a long time for Intel. We fell behind on innovation. As a result, we have been too slow to adapt and to meet your needs. You deserve better, and we need to improve, and we will.

In his introductory memo, Tan restructured the reporting lines for major business units such as the Data Center and AI Group, directing them to report straight to him. This move aimed to enhance accountability and streamline decision-making, ultimately positioning Tan to make impactful choices that shape the company’s future.

Tan has since emphasized an “engineering-focused”culture at Intel, leading to the divestiture of non-core units to hone in on core computing competencies. For instance, Intel has outsourced its marketing responsibilities to Accenture, leveraging AI to bolster the company’s image. While this initiative will result in substantial layoffs to reduce operational costs, it aims to redirect resources to areas deemed promising.

This engineering-focused strategy raises questions about the future of the IFS division. With Tan at the helm, it appears that Intel will prioritize internal usage over external customer commitments for its foundry services, potentially lowering the division’s dependence on outside revenue.

The Future of Intel Foundry Under CEO Tan

The IFS is expected to undergo a transformation under Tan’s leadership, particularly given its current struggles to attract external clients. The anticipated 18A and 14A chips reflect a revised outlook, with the CFO noting in May the limited commitments from external customers for a deeper partnership. As a result, customers can expect a constrained rollout of the 18A technology, primarily for Intel’s internal needs.

Despite some optimism surrounding the IFS’s commitments to new technologies, including developments regarding 18A derivatives and 14A processes, Intel’s background in scaling operations to meet TSMC remains unsubstantiated. A recent focus on domestic chip production sparked some initial hopes, but tangible plans from Intel, particularly concerning its Oregon facility, are still yet to materialize.

Looking ahead, while Intel Foundry retains a future under Tan’s guidance, it is unlikely to flourish as it did under Gelsinger. The main objective appears to be improving revenue streams and curtailing operational losses, which may necessitate strict measures moving forward.

Anticipated Layoffs and Restructuring at Intel

From a market perspective, the stock price may not directly reflect a company’s commitment, but it remains critical for satisfying shareholders and board expectations. Intel has already begun widespread layoffs across various departments aiming to reduce operational overhead and enhance financial performance. Recent reports suggest potential cuts within its Israeli operations, reinforcing the commitment to confronting financial goals, even if it means making difficult choices.

Additionally, product realignment and roadmap adjustments are anticipated, as evidenced by the cancellation of the Falcon Shores AI accelerator project. Nonetheless, the engineering-driven approach adopted by Team Blue may yield improvements in consumer hardware, particularly in the CPU arena where the lack of successful releases since Raptor Lake has been notable. Hints of progress on Nova Lake and Panther Lake provide some optimism for the consumer segment.

Moreover, Intel is likely to increase the outsourcing of its operations, which may include its foundry requirements. Strategic partnerships with TSMC could play a pivotal role in shaping Intel’s future, particularly given the prior focus on internal chip sourcing under Gelsinger. The evolving role of Intel-TSMC collaboration is set to deepen under Tan’s leadership.

Tan’s vision also involves establishing a “startup-like”culture within Intel, focusing on reducing bureaucratic structures, flattening hierarchies, and enhancing responsiveness to market feedback. This customer-centric approach will center on delivering products that better serve end-users and partners alike. Overall, significant changes within the company are expected to unfold as time progresses.

In summary, Intel is poised to continuously refine its business strategies while navigating complex consumer sentiments. CEO Tan has recognized the necessity for decisive actions to guide the company back to prominence.

Source & Images