Influencer Parents Utilize SuperFanVerse to Market Photos and Videos of Their Children to Potential Predators

In recent months, influencer parents who profit from their young children on social media platforms have garnered increased attention and scrutiny. This heightened focus follows significant incidents, such as the arrest of Ruby Franke, a former family vlogger, on serious charges of aggravated child abuse. Such controversies shine a light on the exploitative dynamics that can be present in family vlogging. As children like Ruby’s daughter, Shari Franke, begin to share their experiences regarding the dangers associated with vlogging, public sentiment is gradually shifting. In response to these concerns, states like Utah and California have initiated measures aimed at establishing protective legislation for child influencers, akin to the safeguards enjoyed by child actors. These new laws mandate that parents must financially compensate their children for their on-screen appearances. However, they still fall short of addressing a more fundamental issue: children are unable to provide informed consent for their lives to be shared and monetized online. Compounding these concerns is the likelihood that some parents may exploit loopholes to evade proper compensation or may resort to less visible platforms like SuperFanVerse.

Parents Monetize Their Children on SuperFanVerse

Despite its relatively low profile, SuperFanVerse has attracted the attention of certain influencer parents. The platform has only 59 followers on its official Instagram account, indicating limited visibility. Nonetheless, it provides a mechanism for creators to monetize their fan interactions in a manner similar to subscription services on Instagram and YouTube, where fans pay for access to exclusive content. Within SuperFanVerse, users can set their subscription rates, offering options for monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, and annual subscriptions, enabling followers to view content that is not available to the general public. Notably, the platform maintains strict guidelines against sexual content; thus, subscribers typically receive conventional videos and photos akin to those found on popular platforms like YouTube or TikTok.

Alarmingly, a significant number of users on SuperFanVerse are minors. The platform permits individuals under 18 to create accounts if they submit a parental consent form, often featuring disclaimers stating they are “managed” by their parents. Disturbingly, some subscription rates exceed $1, 000, raising serious ethical questions.

This issue gained traction on TikTok when mom.uncharted raised concerns about SuperFanVerse. In a viral video, she highlighted a 13-year-old girl’s account while taking precautions to protect the minor’s identity. The subscription tiers for this account were shocking, with an annual subscription priced at an extraordinary $13, 200—while shorter subscription options reached $3, 450 for six months and $835 for three months. This alarming reality suggests that the audience for such content is primarily composed of adults, revealing a troubling dynamic where parents appear to sanction the expenditure of substantial sums for access to their child’s photos and videos.

@mom.uncharted
It’s not other teenage girls buying these photos, it’s mainly male adults who have an interest in children. It’s appalling and should be investigated.#parents #parenting #fyp #news #parentsontiktok #moms #daughters #mothers #fathers #motherhood #awareness #childsafety #onlinesafety

♬ original sound – mom.uncharted

Intrigued by the revelations from mom.uncharted, I created an account on SuperFanVerse and was immediately struck by the predominance of minor creators, particularly girls, suggested to me. These accounts are easily identifiable due to disclaimers indicating they are managed by parents. When exploring terms like “model, ” “gymnast, ” or “dancer, ” I found that many of the leading accounts belonged to minors. In fact, several profiles showcased children in revealing swimwear or dance attire, and one account with such imagery had an outrageous annual subscription price of $10, 740. Other accounts offered subscription rates ranging from $10 per month to $5, 000 per year.

Screenshot of parent-run accounts on SuperFanVerse — (SuperFanVerse)

Screenshot of subscription tiers on parent-run minor account on SuperFanVerse — (SuperFanVerse)

It is concerning that parents managing these accounts seem oblivious to the potential dangers associated with platforms like SuperFanVerse. It is no coincidence that numerous accounts feature children in swimsuits or focus on activities like gymnastics, dance, and modeling. The demographic willing to pay exorbitant amounts—like $10, 000—for access to such content raises ethical alarms, hinting at predatory intents. Though SuperFanVerse prohibits sexual content, it permits images of minors in swimsuits and leotards. Moreover, research has shown that predators exploit content uploaded by family vloggers on platforms such as YouTube, often curating such content on illicit websites. Evidence indicates that family vloggers might intentionally choose thumbnails featuring their children in less clothing to maximize viewership. With SuperFanVerse, however, predators need not sift through numerous posts; they can directly acquire the content they’re interested in—thanks to willing parents.

Source & Images