How Nosferatu Utilized a Common Horror Trope That Typically Works (Yet Failed)

Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu is a striking addition to the gothic horror genre, showcasing the director’s distinctive style and artistry. However, it is noteworthy that a prevalent horror trope somewhat diminishes its overall fear factor. While Eggers diverges from the original narrative towards the film’s ending, this shift does not detract from the film’s success. In fact, Nosferatu has achieved a remarkable milestone by making its way to the top of the highest-grossing horror films, establishing itself as Eggers’ most commercially successful project to date, eclipsing both The Northman and The Lighthouse. Its impressive performance at the box office is especially commendable, considering the presence of competing high-budget film releases.

Distinct from the iconic 1922 silent film, Eggers’ rendition of Nosferatu draws heavily from its predecessor, Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror. The director enriches the tale with a diverse array of vampire lore from various sources, including an intriguing retelling of Dracula, allowing him to interweave his unique narrative elements. One of the most noticeable differences is the reimagining of Count Orlok’s appearance.

Nosferatu’s Promotional Strategy: The Mystery of Skarsgård’s Vampire

Crafting Suspense: Eggers’ Vision for Skarsgård’s Count Orlok

Lily Rose Depp in a chilling scene from Nosferatu

Interestingly, audiences were first introduced to Bill Skarsgård’s Orlok only after the film celebrated a staggering $135 million in box office revenue. Concealing pivotal characters during promotional campaigns is a strategic move frequently employed in the horror genre. An exemplary case of this technique’s success is seen in Nicolas Cage’s Longlegs. Nonetheless, estimating the effectiveness of the same approach in Nosferatu is challenging. Skarsgård himself ignited excitement by declaring Orlok to be “the scariest performance of [his] career,”yet a closer analysis of his portrayal raises questions about the efficacy of this marketing tactic.

The pinnacle of horror characters. Bill Skarsgård on the preparation that went into his Orlok transformation, “the scariest performance of [his] career.”pic.twitter.com/fb82GumjeS — Nosferatu (@NosferatuFilm) January 13, 2025

The film’s climax provides a more detailed glimpse of Orlok, emphasizing his unsettling features such as his deteriorated skin and elongated claws. While Nosferatu may have outperformed Longlegs at the box office, it is undeniable that the reveal of Orlok did not quite meet the elevated expectations set by the marketing hype. Despite extensive gore, Orlok’s portrayal does not tap into the deeper levels of fear that audiences might anticipate. The vampire genre continues to evolve, and filmmakers are continually experimenting with fresh strategies to evoke fear—as seen in its transformation over the past century.

The Core of Fear: Simplicity in Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror

Count Orlok (Max Schreck) looming over his victim in the 1922 silent film Nosferatu

Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror remains a quintessential example of cinematic excellence, often regarded as one of the most influential silent films ever made. Its absence of dialogue amplifies suspense and fosters an eerie atmosphere that effectively showcases the visual horror of Orlok. This simplicity serves as a powerful tool, allowing Max Schreck to embody a truly unsettling creature, enhanced by the film’s distinctive expressionist style and haunting set designs characteristic of early 20th-century cinema.

While Skarsgård’s portrayal brings vocal depth to the iconic vampire, the 1922 iteration of Orlok delivers a more visceral and realistic terror that resonates long after the film concludes. Notably, Orlok’s character in the original film is defined by his monstrous traits—sharp, rodent-like teeth, a hunched back, and an unsettlingly gaunt face. This characterization, coupled with the limitations of early filmmaking technology, lends Schreck’s Orlok a significantly more frightening presence than its modern counterpart.

In summary, although Skarsgård’s vocal performance in Nosferatu is commendable, the chilling legacy of the 1922 film continues to cast a long shadow over contemporary interpretations, amplifying the enduring fear inherent in the vampire mythos.

Source & Images