Former Starfield Artist Explains Why Graphic Violence Was Removed

Overview of Starfield’s Approach to Violence

The absence of graphic violence in Starfield was a deliberate decision influenced by both technical challenges and narrative consistency.
As noted by Dennis Mejillones, a character artist associated with Bethesda, the game’s tone does not align with excessive graphic content.

Recent insights from a former Bethesda artist highlight that Starfield was initially envisioned to feature significant violence. Known for their graphic first-person shooters, Bethesda has a history of including intense gore, notably within the Fallout series. However, as the development of Starfield progressed, it became evident that the game would take a different direction, opting for a less violent portrayal.

While Starfield does not shy away from combat, incorporating both gunfights and melee engagements, players have noted a perceived enhancement in combat mechanics compared to Fallout 4. The shooting and melee systems appear to be more refined, suggesting a conscientious approach to action, albeit with a reduction in graphic violence.

In a recent interview with Kiwi Talkz, Dennis Mejillones explained that the initial concept for Starfield included features such as decapitations and unique kill animations. However, due to significant technical issues—particularly concerning the diverse array of suits and helmets—the team struggled to animate these elements in a realistic manner. Given that Starfield was already experiencing technical hurdles post-launch, this decision to limit graphic violence appears to have been prudent.

Technical and Tonal Considerations Behind Violence Reduction

The choice to scale back on graphic violence extended beyond just technical limitations. Mejillones pointed out that the humor associated with the violence in Fallout does not translate well to the more serious tone of Starfield. While references to Bethesda’s prior works exist, such as elements inspired by Doom, Starfield aims for a grounded and realistic approach to its narrative. Introducing excessive gore could have compromised immersion, detracting from the overall experience.

The community of players has expressed their desire for a more authentic and robust experience, often drawing comparisons to the grittiness found in titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 and Mass Effect. While some have suggested that incorporating over-the-top violence could remedy certain perceived shortcomings, such as the lackluster portrayal of nightclubs, it appears that Bethesda’s moderation may have been a wise and necessary decision.

In summary, while Starfield diverges from the graphic violence characteristic of previous Bethesda titles, this choice aligns with both technical feasibility and narrative integrity, ultimately serving the game’s immersive sci-fi experience better than excessive brutality could.

Source & Images