Emilia Pérez’s Oscars Nominations: A Critical Look at the People v Hollywood

The Oscars season is traditionally rife with its share of controversies, and this year is no exception, thanks to the polarizing reception of Emilia Pérez. This unique blend of comedy, musical, and crime drama showcases trans actress Karla Sofía Gascón in the role of a male-presenting Mexican cartel leader. The plot follows her character as she seeks the assistance of Zoe Saldaña’s lawyer in Mexico City to escape the cartel—a journey that involves going undercover to obtain gender-affirming care and transition into her authentic self as Emilia Pérez.

Aside from its perplexing narrative choices, Emilia Pérez is inciting significant backlash. Critics are noting that the film primarily tells a Mexican story but is devoid of Mexican lead actors, being directed by French filmmaker Jacques Audiard in France. Furthermore, the accents of the Spanish-speaking characters have prompted accusations of inauthenticity (source: Today).Despite these critiques, Emilia Pérez has captured more than a dozen Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Actress for Gascón, leaving many to ponder how such a film emerged as the frontrunner for the 2025 Oscars. This inquiry sheds light on the evolving dynamics within Hollywood.

Emilia Pérez Leads All Oscars Contenders Despite Mixed Reviews

A Rare Consensus Among Critics and Audiences

Presently, Emilia Pérez holds a score of 71% on Metacritic and a 75% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes. While these figures are not abysmal, they fail to convey the high acclaim one would expect from a film leading the Oscars race. Should Emilia Pérez clinch the coveted Best Picture title, it could potentially mark the lowest-rated winner since “Crash”in 2006.

Interestingly, while critical feedback has been lukewarm at best, audience reception has been markedly worse, as evidenced by its dismal Rotten Tomatoes audience score of just 26%.The film appears to have alienated its intended demographic groups, particularly the Mexican and LGBTQ+ communities, who have criticized it for reinforcing damaging stereotypes and transphobia (source: CBC; GLAAD).Despite such widespread disapproval from both critics and audiences, Emilia Pérez leads the Oscars nominations—a puzzling phenomenon that emphasizes the motivations of the Academy’s voters.

Hollywood’s Affection for Emilia Pérez Reveals Underlying Issues

Contextualizing the Academy’s Affections

It’s essential to recognize that the Oscars are decided not by public opinion or critic scores, but by the Academy—a unique entity that seems to have an unusual affection for Emilia Pérez. This can be partly understood in the wake of movements such as #OscarsSoWhite, which propelled the Academy to examine its own diversity issues after the stark lack of representation in nominations in 2015 and 2016.

In response to the critiques, the Academy has made strides toward a more diverse voting body, yet it still struggles to achieve true equity in storytelling. Although recent years have seen more balanced nominations across racial and cultural lines, the Academy still tends to view itself through a lens of tokenism rather than genuine representation. Therefore, it is perhaps unsurprising that Hollywood is eager to elevate Emilia Pérez as an emblem of diversity, despite its significant criticism from the communities it aims to represent.

Netflix’s Relentless Campaign for Emilia Pérez

Aggressive FYC Strategy from Netflix

Another variable to consider is the substantial financial investment Netflix allocated toward marketing Emilia Pérez as an Oscar contender. The Academy Awards often mirror popularity contests, where social and marketing presence shape outcomes—a reality that many critics and Oscars insiders recognize. Each year sees studios deploying hefty resources on FYC (for your consideration) campaigns, leading certain films to surge into award consideration, even if their merit is questionable.

Netflix originally acquired Emilia Pérez for $12 million at Cannes, a significant amount considering other distributors opted out; the company has subsequently committed at least double this amount towards its awards campaign (source: Variety).By focusing heavily on the film’s trans and Mexican representation, Netflix aims to bolster positive narratives around the film while downplaying the mounting criticism.

In conclusion, as Netflix pours resources into marketing and advocacy for Emilia Pérez, the dichotomy between Hollywood’s choices and public sentiment becomes strikingly evident. The way forward may see Hollywood gaining the upper hand in this bout, holding true to its usual patterns, while the voices of genuine representation might remain overlooked.

Sources: Today, Metacritic, Rotten Tomatoes, CBC, GLAAD, Variety

Source & Images