Craig Barrett: Intel, Not TSMC, Can Rescue US Chip Industry; Urges Government to Mandate Big Tech Investment in Intel’s Chip Production

Craig Barrett: Intel, Not TSMC, Can Rescue US Chip Industry; Urges Government to Mandate Big Tech Investment in Intel’s Chip Production

Craig Barrett, the former CEO of Intel, has recently adopted a rather confrontational position regarding the swirling rumors and reports about the current state of Team Blue. He asserts that the company must enhance its performance and improve its standing in the semiconductor landscape.

Barrett’s Assertions: TSMC and Others Not Prepared to Move Advanced Technology to the U. S.

The circumstances surrounding Intel are critical, as the company navigates both economic challenges and a complex political environment. Lip-Bu Tan, the CEO of a competing semiconductor firm, has been characterized as having a divided leadership style. Meanwhile, the future of Intel’s foundry division remains uncertain. In an opinion piece published in Fortune, Barrett expressed strong views on Intel’s essentiality in U. S.chip manufacturing.

Barrett emphatically stated, “The USA NEEDS INTEL, ”arguing that neither Samsung nor TSMC has the readiness to transition cutting-edge manufacturing to America. According to him, the tech industry requires a dependable alternative to TSMC, and Intel is uniquely positioned to fulfill that role. While his points prompt consideration, it’s essential to note that both TSMC and Samsung have made significant advancements and are preparing to introduce 2nm manufacturing processes in the U. S.

Intel 18A Process Node Offers 25% Higher Frequency At ISO & 36% Lower Power At Same Frequency Versus Intel 3, Over 30% Density

Barrett further emphasized the urgent need for financial support for Intel. He estimates that Intel requires an investment of at least $40 billion to compete effectively with TSMC in terms of production capabilities, a figure that surpasses the allocations provided by the CHIPS Act. Rather than relying solely on government assistance, Barrett argues that a strategic plan should be implemented to encourage firms like NVIDIA and Apple to invest in Intel’s advanced manufacturing processes, thereby enhancing the company’s operational capacity.

Moreover, he criticized any potential strategies by Intel that might aim to withdraw from competition for leading-edge technologies, advocating instead for a proactive approach. Although his insights are provocative, they fail to fully address the implications of international politics and the substantial investments from TSMC and Samsung, who are poised for technology transfer into the U. S.While Intel’s legacy as a premier chipmaker gives it significance, there remains a lack of new and compelling products that can substantiate its current relevance in the industry.

Source & Images

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *