Intel’s latest entry-level Core Ultra 200H processors exhibit remarkable performance, excelling particularly in thermal management under comparable conditions.
Performance Showdown: Core Ultra 5 225H vs. AMD’s Ryzen AI 7 350
The Arrow Lake series, particularly its desktop variants, has struggled in the gaming arena against AMD’s offerings. However, when it comes to laptop processors, the situation shifts favorably, especially for models equipped with robust integrated graphics. The integrated graphics of the Arrow Lake-H processors, powered by the Battlemage architecture, prove effective, with the Arc 140T in higher-end configurations and the Arc 130T in entry-level models like the Core Ultra 5 225H demonstrating commendable gaming capabilities.
Leveraging a higher core count and a hybrid architecture, even the entry-level 225H provides stiff competition to AMD’s budget and mid-range solutions, like the Ryzen AI 7 350. The 225H is increasingly featured in various laptops, such as the Lenovo Ideapad Pro 5, which also has an AMD variant featuring the Ryzen AI 7 350, an impressive 8-core/16-thread APU built on the Zen 5 architecture. Recently, Chinese reviewer “Geekerwan”conducted a head-to-head benchmark comparison of these processors across various synthetic and gaming tests.
In a majority of benchmark tests, the Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen AI 7 350 exhibited comparable results. While the Ultra 5 225H edged out in certain benchmarks, the Ryzen AI 7 350 demonstrated its strength in others. For instance, in Cinebench R23, the Core Ultra 5 225H outperformed the AMD processor under high wattage scenarios (60-80W), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 delivered better performance in lower wattage settings (10-25W).Overall, the 225H came in report at 2.5% faster than its AMD counterpart, with gaming performance showing near equivalence.
The 225H has a slight advantage in thermal performance, maintaining temperatures below 90 degrees Celsius under peak loads during Cinebench R23 testing, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 hit nearly 100 degrees Celsius, generating more heat within the laptop chassis. This positions both processors as strong candidates for the budget segment, although a more detailed examination of multi-core performance would be beneficial, given the 225H’s higher core count—even if the majority of them are designated as Efficient cores.
This analysis contrasts a 14-core/14-thread processor against AMD’s 8-core/16-thread APU. The Intel variant employs a hybrid architecture without hyperthreading, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 consists of a combination of four Zen 5 cores and four Zen 5c cores, equipped with Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT).Ultimately, both processors present promising prospects for budget laptops, mini PCs, and gaming handhelds, although few handheld manufacturers have adopted these Intel models thus far, aside from custom Ryzen Z2 chips based on the Zen 5 architecture.
For more information on this showdown, see the original source: @realVictor_M
Related Articles:
NVIDIA Reduces RTX 5060 Series Supply to Board Partners to Ensure Pricing Stability
9:51
Lenovo Legion Go 2: Handheld Gaming with AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, 32GB LPDDR5X-8000 RAM, 1TB SSD, 74Whr Battery & 144Hz OLED Display
9:37
LG 32U990A: The World’s First 6K Monitor Featuring Thunderbolt 5 and DisplayHDR 600 Support
8:39
Leave a Reply