Comparing SSH Tunneling and VPN: Which is More Secure?

Comparing SSH Tunneling and VPN: Which is More Secure?

When it comes to creating secure private channels between your computer and a remote server, SSH Tunnels and VPNs are two prevalent technologies that serve distinct purposes. Despite resembling each other superficially, these tools cater to different user needs and scenarios. This article will dive into the realm of SSH Tunneling, outline its workings, contrast it against VPNs, and help you discern which might be better suited for your privacy requirements.

Understanding SSH Tunneling: Functionality and Mechanism

SSH Tunneling involves the process of securely forwarding local connections to a remote network using the SSH protocol. This mechanism works by employing SSH’s capability to execute commands and transmit arbitrary IP packets over a network. One of the main advantages of SSH Tunneling is that it provides encryption for any data traversing the tunnel, even if that data initially lacks encryption. As a result, protocols like HTTP and IRC can operate over the internet without falling prey to Man-in-the-Middle attacks—a significant peace of mind for many users.

A screenshot of a website running unencrypted over a network.

Furthermore, SSH Tunneling offers the advantage of interacting with remote network resources as if they were accessible locally. For instance, executing the command ssh -L 8080:localhost:80 mycoolwebsite.top will load a web server hosted on “mycoolwebsite.top” locally at port 8080. This functionality is particularly useful when you want to share a network resource securely without adjusting firewall ports.

A screenshot of an unencrypted HTTP website running through an SSH tunnel.

Moreover, SSH can support SOCKS proxies using the -D flag, effectively allowing you to utilize the remote SSH server as an exit node for internet browsing. In my experience, this is especially handy when I’m away from home but want to appear as though I’m accessing the web from my home network—a game changer for online privacy!

Comparing SSH Tunnels and VPNs: Key Differences

With a fundamental understanding of SSH Tunnels established, let’s delve into their comparison with traditional VPN solutions.

Scope of Functionality

A primary limitation of SSH Tunnels is their capability to connect to only one host and port at a time. While commendable for rapid, stand-alone port forwarding needs, relying on SSH Tunnels for regular use may create complications. For example, if you need to forward your IRC client and web browser through a tunnel, you will need individual connections for ports 6667 and 443.

A couple of terminals showing two SSH tunnels running on the same system.

In contrast, most VPN services function as virtual network adapters on your device. This means that once a VPN connection is established, all traffic from your computer can route through it automatically. This offers a straightforward and efficient solution for users seeking comprehensive online privacy.

Support for Protocols

Another critical distinction is that SSH Tunnels function solely over TCP segments, meaning they cannot accommodate traffic needing a UDP transport, such as VoIP applications like Mumble and gaming environments like Minecraft.

A screenshot showing that Mumble isn't detecting any service from the SSH tunnel in port 64748.

In contrast, most VPN software can handle both TCP and UDP traffic, making VPNs more versatile for various applications and ensuring smoother experiences even under different usage conditions.

User Experience and Setup

Despite their constraints, SSH Tunnels are relatively straightforward to use and set up. Essentially, you only require an SSH client and server, making the process accessible and requiring minimal configuration to secure your connections.

A terminal showing the command to create a single SSH tunnel in Ubuntu Linux.

Conversely, setting up a VPN can be more complex, particularly if you prefer self-hosted options. For instance, configuring a mesh VPN like Tinc will involve establishing network interfaces and exchanging encryption keys. However, opting for third-party VPN providers can streamline this process considerably.

Throughput Capabilities

Regarding throughput, SSH tunnels frequently match or even surpass the performance of some leading VPN services. In my tests, an SSH tunnel yielded around 93 Mbps, while a Tailscale VPN maintained close at 89 Mbps.

A terminal showing the results of an iperf3 test through an SSH tunnel.

Nonetheless, it’s crucial to acknowledge that overall throughput varies based on the network interfaces involved. For example, a server with a maximum capacity of 100 Mbps will inherently limit any connected client with a 1 Gbps connection.

A terminal showing an iperf3 test between two hosts using Tailscale.

In the tests I conducted, these metrics were evaluated on an Amazon EC2 instance with a bandwidth cap of ~100 Mbps, which aided in maintaining consistent conditions across both scenarios.

Deciding Between SSH Tunnels and VPNs

Ultimately, the choice between SSH tunnels and VPNs will depend on your unique requirements and use cases. Consider the following:

  • If you seek a quick, temporary privacy solution: SSH tunnels should be your go-to choice. With SSH native to most UNIX-based systems, establishing a secure channel can be done in mere moments by executing a couple of terminal commands. This makes SSH Tunnels an ideal option for transient connections between machines.
  • If you need a reliable and extensive network privacy solution: VPNs are the preferred pick. They provide a broader range of options, compatibility with multiple transport protocols, and scalability for larger setups. Although the initial setup might require more effort, the long-term benefits are commendable.

Exploring SSH tunneling and its comparison with VPNs merely scratches the surface of the capabilities of these robust technologies. For further insights into the full potential of SSH, consider checking out our comprehensive guide on using SSH pipes on Linux.

Image credit: Dan Nelson via Unsplash. All alterations and screenshots by Ramces Red.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the primary differences between SSH Tunnels and VPNs?

SSH Tunnels are primarily designed for secure, individual connections to a remote server, making them ideal for quick and temporary uses. In contrast, VPNs provide a broader network-wide protection by routing all device traffic, making them more suitable for continuous and diverse online privacy needs.

2. Can I use SSH Tunneling for VoIP or gaming services?

No, SSH Tunnels only support TCP segments and cannot handle UDP traffic, which is essential for VoIP applications and gaming services. For these uses, a VPN would be a more viable option.

3. How do I know which technology is right for me?

Your choice between SSH Tunnels and VPNs should be based on your specific needs. If you require quick setup for occasional secure connections, SSH Tunnels will suffice. However, if you’re looking for a comprehensive privacy solution for multiple applications, consider investing in a VPN service.

Source&Images

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *