Birdeater Review: A Twisty Horror-Thriller That Falls Short of Its Promising Premise

The independent psychological thriller Birdeater delves into the complexities of emotional manipulation, centered around the couple Louie (Mackenzie Fearnley) and Irene (Shabana Azeez). Helmed by directors Jack Clark and Jim Weir in their feature debut, the film presents a promising start for the filmmakers. However, it ultimately fails to propel the audience into the gripping depths one might anticipate from such a title, named after the formidable bird-eating spider. Despite its merits as a piece of emerging indie cinema, Birdeater lacks the captivating narrative it promises.

Expectations vs. Reality: Birdeater Lacks Gory Thrills

Viewers may make the error of approaching Birdeater with expectations of the visceral gore popular in contemporary horror films. Calling it a horror movie is misleading; while certain aspects flirt with unsettling and visceral moments, these instances are sparse. The film leans heavily on its skillful editing to evoke a sense of disorientation, but this approach also leads to predictability that may hinder its potential cult status.

Strong Technical Aspects Don’t Compensate for Weak Storyline

The opening montage of Birdeater lays out a predictable plot, yet this isn’t necessarily a detractor. The film bravely addresses larger themes related to systemic issues and the insidious nature of toxic masculinity that continues to affect modern society, themes that are present throughout the narrative. What lifts Birdeater beyond mere cautionary tales are its expertly executed technical elements. Despite its limited budget, the film masterfully utilizes precise musical cues, strategic editing choices, and striking visuals to immerse the viewer in the characters’ unraveling realities.

Performances and Character Dynamics

Fearnley brilliantly portrays Louie, the seemingly meek fiancé whose malevolence gradually surfaces as the story progresses. The performances, while solid, could benefit from a more seasoned cast to elevate the slow-burn psychological drama. The crux of the film lies in Louie’s stealthy dismantling of Irene’s autonomy, which could have been more effectively portrayed if Azeez had more presence in her scenes. Although Irene feels overshadowed by Louie’s character, her role needed a more prominent voice throughout.

Despite the scattered building blocks for what could have been a groundbreaking film, Clark and Weir’s debut sparks hope for their evolution as directors.

Exploring Complex Dynamics Among Characters

A notable standout in Birdeater is Ben Hunter’s portrayal of Dylan, a character whose evolution from an unlikable persona to one deserving of empathy provides a welcome twist. Set against the backdrop of a bachelor party, the film navigates the often-tired “boys vs. girls”conflict, but Clark and Weir go beyond this binary, illustrating that all characters operate under some form of toxic dynamic, with Irene being the most impacted by Louie’s manipulations.

Third Act Twist Falls Flat

Although Birdeater distinguishes itself as a deliberate entry in the genre, it disappointed me not due to a lack of action, but rather a lack of conviction. The film presents multiple opportunities for Clark and Weir to dive deeper into the core issues they aim to explore. Despite a backdrop of tension, many high-stakes moments fail to resonate, missing that emotional impact expected from a film of its nature.

The reveal of Irene’s guilt felt particularly underwhelming. The violent and unexpected event that set her on a path deeper into Louie’s grasp lacked the emotional heft it needed. Whether this disconnect stems from the timing of the flashback or a broader lack of connection with Irene remains debatable. Birdeater didn’t need to resort to excessive gore to have a stronger impact, but it played it too safe, limiting its potential for deeper reflection.

Birdeater is currently available in theaters and on VOD. Running for 113 minutes, the film is not rated.

Source & Images