Battlefield 6 Achieves 300+ FPS with Ryzen 9800X3D and RTX 5080, but Intel Core i9 14900K Shows 33% Performance Drop

Recent reports suggest that Battlefield 6 is exceptionally well-optimized for AMD’s X3D processors. A Twitch streamer, known as Bruhskey, achieved an impressive average frame rate of over 300 FPS while playing the game with a Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with an RTX 5080.

Performance Insights from Twitch Streamer Bruhskey

As is typical with new releases, triple-A titles increasingly demand more robust hardware. While expectations might be that Battlefield 6 would not be as forgiving on previous generations of gaming rigs, Bruhskey’s findings present a more optimistic scenario. For those equipped with 300+Hz gaming monitors, the possibility of a seamless experience appears attainable.

Bruhskey’s configuration featured the exceptional AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, regarded as a top-tier gaming processor, in conjunction with the GeForce RTX 5080. The combination of these components is indicative of one of the most robust setups available, enabling an impressive 300+ FPS in this modern title. Considering that the game lists the RTX 3060 Ti as its recommended GPU, these findings point to the game’s solid optimization.

BATTLEFIELD 6 Average fps performance was very good, NUMBERS/SPECS BELOW👇 330-370fps gpu310-330fps cpu6.7-8.5 PCL Latency Not allowed to show screenshots but for those asking, 9800x3d + 6400 1:1 2133 32gb + 5080 3200mhz core AND no optimized nvidia driver.

— Bruhskey (@bruhskey) August 1, 2025

Bruhskey also asserts that users of the Ryzen 9800X3D and similar advanced X3D chips can expect significantly higher performance compared to Intel’s offerings. In discussions, he noted that a friend using the Core i9 14900K—Intel’s premier gaming CPU—experienced a performance drop of approximately 110 FPS, translating to a 30-33% reduction when using the same GPU and settings.

Real matches, mostly Cairo on playtime. Friend of mine with same gpu but 14900k got 110 less fps than me while matching settings. Seems like x3d will matter A LOT. Did not have replay buffer or use ndi for game pc transmission. Only ea app and the game were open.1440p native

— Bruhskey (@bruhskey) August 2, 2025

However, readers should approach these figures with caution, as Bruhskey was unable to share visual proof due to an embargo. He indicated his setup was running at a native resolution of 1440p, but didn’t clarify if any Frame Generation or upscaling technologies were active. Notably, the absence of such technologies, widely known to enhance performance, calls into question the feasibility of maintaining 300+ FPS.

Additionally, Bruhskey’s system latency measured remarkably low, between 6.7 to 8.5 nanoseconds, which further attests to the potential efficiency of the Ryzen 9800X3D. Should his observations hold true regarding the substantial performance difference between the two processors, it could reflect broader trends favoring X3D CPUs in demanding titles. Historically, games have benefitted from the higher L3 cache present in X3D designs, suggesting that AMD’s 3D V-Cache technology continues to provide advantages in performance-heavy scenarios.

Source & Images