data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae110/ae110d677ad1ee7f40c16c656b53c039027e1e6a" alt="Apple’s Last-Minute Request to Defend $20 Billion Google Search Engine Deal Denied by Judge for Being Untimely"
Recent revelations indicate that Google has been disbursing an astonishing $20 billion to Apple to maintain its status as the default search engine on Apple’s suite of devices. This hefty payment raises concerns about fair competition, a sentiment echoed by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who has pointed out that such financial arrangements create an uneven playing field for other competitors. In light of this, Apple sought to intervene as a defendant in this significant legal matter. However, a recent ruling has sided against Apple, citing the untimeliness of its intervention request.
Apple’s Failed Attempt to Defend Its Google Agreement
U. S.District Judge Amit Mehta delivered a decisive statement regarding Apple’s intention to challenge the $20 billion deal. According to reports from the Courthouse News Service, the judge noted that Apple’s procrastination would lead to unnecessary delays. The tech giant had proposed to introduce three additional witnesses in its defense, but the request failed to persuade the court.
“Apple knew (or should have known) that waiting two-and-a-half months to intervene in a proceeding scheduled to last just eight months altogether would constitute a significant delay.”
Apple’s intervention request was submitted on December 23, just prior to the Christmas holidays. Judge Mehta highlighted that bringing in more testimonies would create significant postponements in the trial schedule. Apple contended that this intervention was crucial for ensuring that the judge has a comprehensive record for making an informed decision on the necessary remedial measures.
Further reports suggest that had Apple’s request been accepted, it could have led to a surge of similar requests from other companies benefiting from Google’s search engine distribution agreements. Such a scenario would have posed considerable challenges for both Google and the Department of Justice, potentially compromising the integrity of the proceedings. Nevertheless, the judge granted Apple the opportunity to participate as an amicus curiae, allowing the company to submit additional insights post-hearing in the months ahead. This will enable Apple to present its viewpoint as the court formulates its remedial actions.
As Apple navigates this legal landscape, the tech giant seems poised to leverage this opportunity. Leaving billions at stake is not in line with Apple’s business approach. Eddy Cue, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Services, previously indicated that, as it stands, Google Search is without an adequate alternative, subtly affirming that the continuity of this financial partnership is essential for Apple.
For further details, refer to the full article on Courthouse News Service.
Leave a Reply ▼