Jon Prosser’s Legal Troubles: Apple’s Suit Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft
Jon Prosser has made a name for himself in the technology field as a prominent leaker, sharing insights and predictions regarding Apple’s product launches for over five years. His notable revelations include details about the iPhone 9, features of the Apple Watch, and a redesign of the MacBook Air in 2022. However, he has recently found himself at the center of a legal storm following allegations from Apple concerning unauthorized access to confidential information.
Details of the Lawsuit
As reported by The Verge, Apple has officially filed a lawsuit against Prosser. The complaint centers around claims that he collaborated with a man named Michael Ramacciotti, an acquaintance of an Apple engineer named Ethan Lipnik. According to the lawsuit, Prosser allegedly incentivized Ramacciotti with financial rewards and job prospects in exchange for unauthorized access to an iPhone belonging to Lipnik, which contained sensitive development builds of iOS 26.
How the Breach Occurred
Ramacciotti reportedly discovered the passcode for Lipnik’s device and accessed it while Lipnik was away from the phone. Following this breach, Ramacciotti conducted a video call with Prosser, where he showcased the pre-release software to him.
Apple learned of this significant cybersecurity breach in April, prompted by an anonymous tip-off. This led to the dismissal of Lipnik, who failed to adhere to proper protocols regarding the safeguarding of unreleased software. By this point, Prosser had already published several videos on his YouTube channel discussing what he believed would be termed iOS 19, later confirmed as iOS 26.
Prosser’s Defense
Apple contends that they possess substantial evidence implicating Prosser in this illicit activity. In response, Prosser has categorically denied the allegations, asserting that he did not conspire to access any devices and had no knowledge of how the sensitive information was acquired. He expressed his willingness to engage with Apple to resolve the matter:
For the record: This is not how the situation played out on my end. Luckily have receipts for that. I did not “plot” to access anyone’s phone. I did not have any passwords. I was unaware of how the information was obtained. Looking forward to speaking with Apple on this.https://t.co/NSUlJPMbld
— jon prosser (@jon_prosser) July 18, 2025
Next Steps and Implications
At this juncture, it remains uncertain whether Apple is inclined to engage in dialogue with Prosser, especially considering the severity of the claims against him. The lawsuit has sought compensatory damages and aims to secure a court order preventing Prosser from disclosing any future Apple trade secrets.
As this case unfolds, it highlights the ongoing tensions between high-profile leakers and major tech companies, raising broader questions about cybersecurity and intellectual property rights in the digital age.
Leave a Reply